Thursday, January 15, 2026

If It Please the Court

I

 I am going to talk a bit about Nance's comment on yesterday's post, which, to be scrupulously clear, I did not in the least interpret as an attack, and which I do not want to sound defensive responding to, although I probably will. 

The comment: "That little grade one boy is THE reason that I do not use libraries for books. I do not like to give books back, period. So I buy books. I support libraries, I think they are wonderful, I recommend libraries, and when I was teaching I made great use of our school's library and library staff. As a child, I adored my town's librarian, who let me take out dozens of books at a time (against the rules), but I always hated taking them back.

Books are my one extravagance. That kid may grow up to be just like me."

I want SO MUCH not to be a stereotypical shush-ing, cranky librarian. Both of these can be difficult, because some classes are SO LOUD and really provoke the crankiness. I had one class at a school I'm not at anymore that literally spiked my blood pressure. There were four boys in it that would have probably been okay, a bit challenging maybe, on their own, but together they were a perfect storm of belligerence, boundary-testing and defiance. Mostly I could meet this with a degree of humour - once I told them to go line up because their class was leaving and one said "is this the end of our library time, or are we getting kicked out?" and I said "a little bit of both!" Once, before Christmas when everyone was burned out, I lost my temper, and that did not feel good. In January I set some clearer, firmer boundaries and changed up some procedures, and after that it was fine.

As for the book limits and return policies - I do regularly bend or break the rules. The teachers are really good at letting me know individual circumstances, and I do not believe in penalizing a child for things that are out of their control. There's a difference between that, though, and the student saying "I already returned that" or "I never took that out". In the vast majority of those cases, the student comes back with the book, usually with zero shame (baller move), or the parent sends the book back with an apologetic note. Also, whenever anyone says the book has been returned, we always check the shelves for it, because every once in a while something doesn't get scanned in properly and is reshelved without being scanned. That is a tiny minority of cases, though. 

If a student is passionate about a particular book, I will happily waive the renewal limits and let them keep it all year, unless someone else requests it. Once I saw a grade three boy hiding some craft books and asked him why and he said "I can't take out books today and I'm afraid these are going to get tooken by another kid who's creative!" So I let him take the books. But if we don't impose any kind of limit (which I have tried), it... doesn't go well. There needs to be a bit of incentive for the child or their parents to at least make a cursory effort to find the book, or we would rapidly have no books left. One grade six student graduated last year with eight graphic novels (the most desired genre) not returned. That is a serious dent in our collection. If a book has been out for a long time I send a notice to the parent assuring them that no payment is needed, but asking them to confirm that the book is lost. I can then declare it lost, the student starts over fresh, and we decide whether the book will be replaced. 

I don't believe the little boy yesterday (with whom I have a fairly good relationship) didn't want to return the books. He had just forgotten to put them in the return bin, and, well, it's January. 

Now, about libraries. My town library was in a little house in our little town, and I could go alone but my dad had to come over sometimes when the librarian called him to approve the level of books I wanted to take and the number.In university I spent blissful hours in the library. The one sour note was during my master's degree, when the library claimed I hadn't returned some stupid Androgyny book that I took out for some stupid essay that it wasn't even helpful for, and I DEFINITELY returned it and they charged me EIGHTY DOLLARDS. So I understand the indignation of a wrongly-accused library patron. And it is a perfectly valid sentiment to not like returning books. . But generally, it is one of the most magnificent things for someone like me.

 I read 191 books last year. Assuming each one cost twenty dollars - hard to get one for less these days, many are more - that adds up to three thousand, eight hundred and twenty dollars. I have one or more bookshelves in every room of the house except the bathrooms and the kitchen (well, there kind of is one, but it holds cookbooks and dishes). So I a positively delighted to give many books back. If I don't want to give one back, I will usually buy a copy, and I'm grateful that I have the library to preview it before I know. I pre-ordered Holly by Stephen King a couple of years ago when Matt was going to be away, for something to look forward to. After I read it, I had mild regret for having bought it in hardcover, because it was not one I would want to keep (unlike The Outsider, or If It Bleeds, which also feature Holly Gibney - although The Life of Chuck is my favourite entry in If It Bleeds. It's up there with Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption for heart-deep beauty, bittersweetness and wonder). I also lend books pretty freely, and just consider it off-site storage, although not books that I am too afraid to lose. 

Being able to borrow thirty books at a time from the library (only this year, because Sarah) and then return them fits my lifestyle really well. I can completely see how it would not be the same for others. When the kids were small, I thought going to the library and getting them their own card and then letting them borrow their own books was the most delightful idea ever.

It was a nightmare. I was not an organized parent. I slept badly, what sleep I got was interrupted several times an hour by a sleep apnea that was not diagnosed until many years later, I was painfully anxious, and my husband traveled a lot. I was constantly stressed about losing their library books, finding their library books, where to keep their cards. In the end, I took out books for them on my own card and it was much better. Eve now has a library card that covers Hamilton (where she lives) and Ottawa (where I live) - she borrows ebooks nearly exclusively, but also the odd paper book. She also has some kind of lucky charm that means she keeps finding perfect copies of books she wants that are used.

Nance, I so value your opinion and perspective and I so hope this doesn't come off bitchy. I also thank you for sparking this post, because it is the fastest something has come out of my head onto the screen for weeks, possibly months. I love books. I love libraries. I love being a librarian  - the other day a little girl pointed at a poster we have up of David from the David Shannon books (okay, this is super embarrassing but I just realized both the author and the character are named David HE IS WRITING ABOUT HIMSELF, the story just became so much more layered). I walked over to the picture book section and pulled it out and gave it to her and she looked at me like I was a magician. I love the kids (even when they're cartwheeling on my last nerve), and I really try to make library a positive experience for them. 

In the spirit of transparency, I should be clear that I also buy books. More books than I should. More books than I can probably read in a lifetime? I used to own no books I had not read. I once declared that I was going to achieve Zero Growth with books, as in, if one came in, one went out. Neither of these things are true as of this moment. This is paper books - sometimes I just want a pristine trade paperback that I can caress knowing no one else has. Sometimes I hear about a book and check on the Kindle store if it's available for less than five dollars, and if it is I buy it. If I had to house all my Kindle books in my, um, house, the whole "no bookshelves in the bathrooms and kitchen" thing would have to be revisited. Today I had to go out in a veritable blizzard, and since I was out anyway I went by the bookstore to buy Horse by Geraldine Brooks. I had no desire to read this book, although I like the author, but this year I read Memorial Days, her book about grieving her husband who was super fit and also a writer and died of a massive heart attack at age sixty. She had to finish this book while grieving, so I thought I would buy it and give her my two dollar royalty support. 

(Also, books are NOT my one extravagance, so more power to Nance on that as well. And the little boy could do much worse than growing up to be just like her.)



Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Books Read in 2025: Four-Star Fantasy and Science Fiction/Speculative (part I)

I just Googled which animal has the worst short-term memory. Apparently bees are extremely forgetful, chimps also are surprisingly so given that they are the closest living relatives to humans. Dogs also only remember events for two minutes. I was about to call bullshit on this, given that Zarah introduced Lucy to the Starbucks pup cup when she was here in August, and the next day when we walked up to Starbucks Lucy lost her mind. But this is because it was an associative memory, not an episodic one. Because it was associated with food, she remembered. This also explains why birds and squirrels can find their hidden food caches. 

That's about as far as I care to take that research right now, although it is really interesting. I was just looking for a way to say "right now I am trying to cultivate the memory span of a "insert name of animal with extremely short memory span". Except I just realized that's not even really what I meant, wtf brain. What I want is to jettison, or greatly reduce, my anticipatory thinking, so I won't think that the way I feel right now is the way I'm going to feel forever. 

It's January. My body and brain don't really take to January. I now know that this is a thing for me, which is both positive - I know it's coming, I know I can't make a lot of plans or try to accomplish a lot other than work and keeping the house just above condemned status. I go to bed early, I do gentle exercise most days, and I just hold on - and negative, because every time the fog comes down I feel like a hamster on a wheel, and also because, well, it sucks. In the past couple of weeks, in addition to the old knee pain, I have developed a really painful tendinitis in my left hand and wrist (a new fun thing!). Usually a yoga session followed by a fairly gentle treadmill session makes me knee feel better, until yesterday when it made it feel worse. How annoying is it to be at an age when too much activity hurts and too little activity also hurts, and it's an endless battle trying to figure out the perfect amount - my knee is freaking Goldilocks. Yesterday while I was lying in bed after turning on the light I realized I had shooting nerve pain down my right arm also, and that my hips were throbbing. 

It's unlikely that all of this is permanent. But you know when the power goes out, and you don't know how long it's going to be out? And in some ways it would be easier to go without power for ten hours if you knew it was definitely coming back on after that, than for two hours when you have no idea? It's kind of like that. My body has the weirdest tendency to throw up immune responses for no reason, or for stupid reasons. When Matt used to travel when the kids were little, he would come home and I would finally unclench, and then I would invariably get some weird condition, with symptoms that you could google, and it was a real thing. Once my hands and feet developed sores all over them and felt like pulsing bags of infection. I went to the doctor and he said it was pompholyx eczema. He had a little computer and he was clearly finding this fascinating, which in retrospect is hilarious, he was like  *tap tap tap* "oh man, this is so interesting -- I mean, sucks to be you, you've probably got this forever now". He was the emergency doc, though, and when I saw my own she said "you don't have it forever, it was an immune response to stress." And she was right, I've never gotten it again. Once my sciatic nerves got so inflamed I couldn't sit or lie on my back, I had to lie in bed on my side. Only last two days. 

I'm not saying any of this for sympathy, just to show that there's no reason I have to think that any of the pain I'm in right now is permanent. I'm breaking in new orthotics, and once I get further along with that my knee could feel better. I have benefits again, which means I can go a little heavier on physio and massage for a while. 

One of my grade one boys burst into tears today when I said he had a lot of books out and needed to bring some back before he could take out more. He declared that he didn't HAVE any books out and then when I showed him on the computer which books were signed out to him he said his dad just FORGOT. The teacher calmed him down, and then five minutes after the class left he came back with a friend and with wounded dignity held out two books that had clearly been left in his bag (poor dad, being thrown under the bus). I said thank you and let him choose new books. It's hard being six in January.

As for my own brain? I tried to open my office door with my car keys. I came hone from work and took out my contacts and then couldn't find my glasses anywhere, because this morning instead of bringing them to the bathroom when I got up I put them in my bedside table drawer (WHY?) I walked into the office at my morning school and couldn't figure out how to ask for a box of Kleenex. "May I... can I please... I mean could... Kleenex?" Kim in the office asked if she had to run the concussion protocol on me. 

Four-Star Sci-Fi and Fantasy/Speculative Part I

 Long Live Evil (Time of Iron #1) by Sarah Rees Brennan: Synopsis from Goodreads: When her whole life collapsed, Rae still had books. Dying, she seizes a second chance at living: a magical bargain that lets her enter the world of her favourite fantasy series.

She wakes in a castle on the edge of a hellish chasm, in a kingdom on the brink of war. Home to dangerous monsters, scheming courtiers and her favourite fictional character: the Once and Forever Emperor. He’s impossibly alluring, as only fiction can be. And in this fantasy world, she discovers she's not the heroine, but the villainess in the Emperor's tale.

So be it. The wicked are better dressed, with better one-liners, even if they're doomed to bad ends. She assembles the wildly disparate villains of the story under her evil leadership, plotting to change their fate. But as the body count rises and the Emperor's fury increases, it seems Rae and her allies may not survive to see the final page.

This adult epic fantasy debut from Sarah Rees Brennan puts the reader in the villain's shoes, for an adventure that is both 'brilliant' (Holly Black) and 'supremely satisfying' (Leigh Bardugo). Expect a rogue's gallery of villains including an axe wielding maid, a shining knight with dark moods, a homicidal bodyguard, and a playboy spymaster with a golden heart and a filthy reputation.


I just heard the term 'romantasy' a few months ago and immediately hated it. But I hate the word 'shacket' too - maybe I just don't like portmanteaus? I would have said that I don't read romantasy, but I love pretty much everything by Sarah Rees Brennan, and if I examine the component parts, I am forced to conclude that SRB does, in fact, write romantasy. I don't even know if it's good, but there is something about her writing that hooks me like heroin. 

This is magnificently ridiculous, with Brennan's trademark exquisitely snarky voice (and yes, I was rooting for the stupid romance, I hate myself). The court intrigues were deliciously labyrinthine. I'm only mad that I read it, as usual, without ascertaining whether there would be a lengthy wait for the next in the series, which there is. Hmph. (I read it last January - six months to go!)

Unnatural Magic (Unnatural Magic #1) by C.M. Waggoner: Synopsis from Goodreads: Onna can write the parameters of a spell faster than any of the young men in her village school. But despite her incredible abilities, she’s denied a place at the nation’s premier arcane academy. Undaunted, she sails to the bustling city-state of Hexos, hoping to find a place at a university where they don’t think there’s anything untoward about providing a woman with a magical education. But as soon as Onna arrives, she’s drawn into the mysterious murder of four trolls.

Tsira is a troll who never quite fit into her clan, despite being the leader’s daughter. She decides to strike out on her own and look for work in a human city, but on her way she stumbles upon the body of a half-dead human soldier in the snow. As she slowly nurses him back to health, an unlikely bond forms between them, one that is tested when an unknown mage makes an attempt on Tsira’s life. Soon, unbeknownst to each other, Onna and Tsira both begin devoting their considerable talents to finding out who is targeting trolls, before their homeland is torn apart…

I read this author's The Village Library Demon-Hunting Society first and was so smitten that I gave away a bunch of copies of it as gifts. I wasn't sure how I felt about this one being in a different world, when my preference is generally for urban fantasy (our world but sometimes cats talk and demons are a thing). I had the sense that this was just a writer that clicks for me, though, and that was correct. 

There are two quite distinct storylines here before they converge, and I was equally invested in each. The world-making was glorious. Onna is a wonderful character - smart and brave and intrepid without being too plucky. As for the relationship between Tsira the troll (female) and Jeckran the half-dead soldier (male) - what in the delightful, gender-bent, hilarious, happy-making heck. Is this what romantasy is? Do I like romantasy now? No, I bet the women are not usually three times the size of the men and four times as strong. Maybe I only like trollmantasy? It looks like the second book in the series is the same world but a different cast of characters. I am up for it. 

The Imposition of Necessary Obstacles (The Investigations of Mossa and Pleiti #2) by Malka Ann Older: Synopsis from Goodreads: Investigator Mossa and Scholar Pleiti reunite to solve a brand-new mystery in the follow-up to the fan-favorite cozy space opera detective mystery The Mimicking of Known Successes that Hugo Award-winning author Charlie Jane Anders called “an utter triumph.”

Mossa has returned to Valdegeld on a missing person’s case, for which she’ll once again need Pleiti’s insight.

Seventeen students and staff members have disappeared from Valdegeld University—yet no one has noticed. The answers to this case could be found in the outer reaches of the Jovian system—Mossa’s home—and the history of Jupiter’s original settlements. But Pleiti’s faith in her life’s work as scholar of the past has grown precarious, and this new case threatens to further destabilize her dreams for humanity’s future, as well as her own.

I was annoyed at first that my library didn't have this as an ebook, which is how I read the first book, but it's a beautiful book and the copy was almost brand new, so I ended up being grateful to read the paper copy.

There's something deeply pleasurable about the writing style in this series - measured, formal, sometimes almost stilted. I started looking up every word I didn't immediately recognize and found words borrowed from Spanish, Japanese, Indonesian, Arabic, Portuguese, French, and Hindi, in addition to some words crafted specifically for the story. As with the first book, I found the world-building flawless, with its irresistible combination of Victorian-era cozyness and far-future strangeness. I longed to go out into the harsh elements and then come back to my warm rooms and order tea and scones and have them arrive BY DUMBWAITER. The mystery was again tangled with the bewildering foibles of human nature, and the solution was satisfying without being neat.

I enjoyed Mossa and Pleiti's distinct personalities and methods, but I confess that I started to feel slightly annoyed at Pleiti in this book. Mossa is perhaps not the most demonstrative of lovers, but I felt like there was ample evidence of her attachment, yet Pleiti persisted in being a bit of a needy whiner. If Mossa did express affection, Pleiti dismisses it as an 'exaggeration, a meaningless verbal tic'. I'd like to say this is vexing to me because I identify more with Mossa than Pleiti, but that would be a lie. Obviously I will be leaping on the third book at the very earliest opportunity. 

Dwellers by Eliza Victoria: Synopsis from Goodreads: The rules are strict and absolute:Rule No. 1: Don't kill the body you inhabit.

Rule No. 2: Never mention your previous name again.

Rule No. 3: Don't talk about your previous life. Ever.

But what happens when, in escaping your old life by stealing a new one, you jump out of the frying pan and into the fire?
Cousins from a clan of dwellers--people who inhabit the bodies and lives of others--become brothers when they take over the bodies of Jonah and Louis. An injury forces them to remain in the brothers' house, where they discover that the basement holds a dead body! As old and new secrets come to light, it becomes clear there is no such thing as actions without consequences.

Fans of Richard Morgan, Adam Silvera, and Blake Crouch's speculative fiction will adore Eliza Victoria's action-packed supernatural mystery. Winner of the Philippine National Book Award, Dwellers is the urban fantasy novel that you won't want to miss!


This is short and subtle, but packs quite an impact. This kind of device has always fascinated me, and it's easy to have it come off cartoonishly. When it's done right, it is terrifying, both the possibility of it and the obvious corrupting effect. I loved the tv show Travelers, and one scene in particular, where the traveler is trying to convince someone who knew his host person of the truth, and he's so credible, but of course she doesn't believe him because who would, ever? Then there's the added element of the dead body in the house, and now the people inhabiting the new bodies have to work without crucial information, but, I mean look, you steal someone's body maybe you should do a modicum of research to make sure there's no dead body in their basement first, right? Like how many times have you done this, maybe the fourth rule should include getting some intel on your upcoming host body. 

The Bones Beneath My Skin by T.J. Klune: Synopsis from Goodreads: Synopsis from Goodreads: A spine-tingling thriller by New York Times bestselling author TJ Klune, about a 10-year-old girl with an impossible power, her father, and an unlikely stranger, who come together to confront the dangerous forces that want her at all costs. A strange story of family, love, comets, and bacon. Perfect for fans of Stranger Things.

In the spring of 1995, Nate Cartwright has lost everything: his parents are dead, his older brother wants nothing to do with him, and he's been fired from his job as a journalist in Washington DC. With nothing left to lose, he returns to his family's summer cabin outside the small mountain town of Roseland, Oregon to try and find some sense of direction. The cabin should be empty. It's not. Inside is a man named Alex. And with him is an extraordinary little girl who calls herself Artemis Darth Vader. Artemis, who isn't exactly as she appears.

Soon it becomes clear that Nate must make a choice: let himself drown in the memories of his past, or fight for a future he never thought possible. Because the girl is special. And forces are descending upon them who want nothing more than to control her.


Look, this is a perfectly lovely book, but it is in no way a spine-tingling thriller. It is utterly charming and healing and life-affirming, and has great narrative energy. It's pretty clear the way things are probably going to go, but I am way less opposed to that than I used to be. It does have one sex scene in it that is graphic in a way that seemed jarring against the tone of the rest of the book - I've discussed this with other people who agreed. I believe the author is queer and also asexual, so I have no idea if he was like "okay, let's stick some filth in here to appease you lecherous monsters". It didn't bother me, but it did raise my eyebrows a good few millimetres. Then again, like I keep saying, I don't read romantasy except by accident, so maybe I have no natural immunity. 

The Warbler by Sarah Beth Durst: Synopsis from Goodreads: From the author of The Lies Among Us comes a magical tale about mothers and daughters, choices and consequences, and the real meaning of home when every place feels like a cage. Ten months. That’s the longest Elisa has stayed anyplace, constantly propelled by her fear that if she puts down roots, a family curse will turn her into a tree.

But she’s grown tired of flitting from town to town and in and out of relationships. When she discovers a small town in Massachusetts where mysterious forces make it impossible for the residents to leave, she hopes she can change her fate.
As Elisa learns about the town’s history, she understands more about the women in her family, who seem doomed to never get what they want. Now she believes she’s stuck, too—is that a patch of bark on her arm? But her neighbor’s collection of pet birds sings secrets that Elisa can almost understand—secrets she must unravel in order to be truly alive.


My favourite of this author's that I've read so far, which just reinforces bad decisions on my part, because why did I try another one when two hadn't worked already? I felt off balance for a lot of this since I think I went in slightly misunderstanding the foundation. That's fine - I don't mind when things are predictable if they're done well, but this was nicely unpredictable, with a marked 'a-ha' moment once things fell into place. There's a through line here about the fraughtness of mother-daughter relationships, which is directly influenced by the limitations placed on women by outside forces, that is not hammered on but is effective. I really enjoyed the quirky details of the little town, the lack of forced love interest, and the attention paid to female friendships. 

Light from Uncommon Stars by Ryka Aoki: Synopsis from Goodreads: Good Omens meets The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet in Ryka Aoki's Light From Uncommon Stars, a defiantly joyful adventure set in California's San Gabriel Valley, with cursed violins, Faustian bargains, and queer alien courtship over fresh-made donuts.
Shizuka Satomi made a deal with the devil: to escape damnation, she must entice seven other violin prodigies to trade their souls for success. She has already delivered six.

When Katrina Nguyen, a young transgender runaway, catches Shizuka's ear with her wild talent, Shizuka can almost feel the curse lifting. She's found her final candidate.



But in a donut shop off a bustling highway in the San Gabriel Valley, Shizuka meets Lan Tran, retired starship captain, interstellar refugee, and mother of four. Shizuka doesn't have time for crushes or coffee dates, what with her very soul on the line, but Lan's kind smile and eyes like stars might just redefine a soul's worth. And maybe something as small as a warm donut is powerful enough to break a curse as vast as the California coastline.

As the lives of these three women become entangled by chance and fate, a story of magic, identity, curses, and hope begins, and a family worth crossing the universe for is found.

I loved this. It was such a weird mash-up of tropes and themes, with realistic and heart-wrenching situations alongside bonkers out-of-the-blue ones, presented matter-of-factly with a kind-spirited hopefulness. That said, there were big chunks that I felt were ignored in the name of a resolution - like, what about the music students are already in hell? What exactly was the deal that Satomi struck? It was referred to many times but I don't think it was ever clearly spelled out. It's one thing if something you did when you were young and misguided results in someone dying, I guess there's not a whole lot you can do there, but if your actions consigned them to eternal damnation and you get regular facetime with a demon you should at least investigate whether there's a way to improve things? I got to the end of the book, heaved a rather satisfied sigh, and then suddenly thought WAIT a minute. The loose ends were many. It wasn't a deal-breaker for me, but it did keep this from being a five-star read.

Dissolution by Nichols Binge: Synopsis from Goodreads: A woman dives into her husband's memories to uncover a decades-old feud threatening reality itself in this staggering technothriller from the bestselling author of Ascension.

Maggie Webb has lived the last decade caring for elderly husband, Stanley, as memory loss gradually erases all the beautiful moments they created together. It's the loneliest she's ever felt in her life.

When a mysterious stranger named Hassan appears at her door, he reveals a shocking truth: Stanley isn't losing his memories. Someone is actively removing them to hide a long-buried secret from coming to light. If Maggie does what she's told, she can reverse it. She can get her husband back.

Led by Hassan and his technological marvels, Maggie breaks into her husband's mind, probing the depths of his past in an effort to save him. The deeper she dives, the more she unravels a mystery spanning continents and centuries, each layer more complex than the last.


But Hassan cannot be trusted. Not just memories are disappearing, but pieces of reality itself. If Maggie cannot find out what Stanley did all those years ago, and what Hassan is after now, she risks far more than her husband's life. The very course of human history hangs in the balance.

Deeply enjoyable, complex and engaging. Reminded me a little of Lexicon by Max Barry. I always love a good 'high-tech phenomenon with thorny ethical implications' story. Unreliable narrators, the sense that anyone can be untrustworthy or have nefarious motives - when memory is involved can you even trust yourself? There is the question of how much memory is linked to identity, and how if you have the chance to really know everything about your loved one, should you take it? Plus a really good love story. 

Katabasis by R.F. Kuang: Synopsis from Goodreads:Dante’s Inferno meets Susanna Clarke’s Piranesi in this all-new dark academia fantasy from R. F. Kuang, the #1 New York Times bestselling author of Babel and Yellowface, in which two graduate students must put aside their rivalry and journey to Hell to save their professor’s soul—perhaps at the cost of their own.

Katabasis, noun, Ancient Greek:
The story of a hero’s descent to the underworld


Alice Law has only ever had one goal: to become one of the brightest minds in the field of Magick. She has sacrificed everything to make that a reality: her pride, her health, her love life, and most definitely her sanity. All to work with Professor Jacob Grimes at Cambridge, the greatest magician in the world.

That is, until he dies in a magical accident that could possibly be her fault.
Grimes is now in Hell, and she’s going in after him. Because his recommendation could hold her very future in his now incorporeal hands and even death is not going to stop the pursuit of her dreams….

Nor will the fact that her rival, Peter Murdoch, has come to the very same conclusion.

Insanely readable - I thought I might have to break it up with other books but I couldn't put it down, much more so than with Yellowface. I found the magic system delightful, and the preoccupation with chalk. Occasionally the trekking through hell got a tiny bit tedious, and I was glad of a return to the earlier timeline, with its skewering of academia even while describing how heady and transporting it can be when you're really into what you're learning. I thought Alice was a really great complex character, with her distasteful pick-me attributes that were a defense mechanism that was always bound to fail miserably. I also usually hate stories involving a misunderstanding destroying a relationship, because the misunderstanding it often ridiculous. In this case I felt like it worked.

Lessons in Magic and Disaster by Charlie Jane Anders: Synopsis from Goodreads: In the vein of Alice Hoffman and Charlie Jane Anders's own All the Birds in the Sky comes a novel full of love, disaster, and magic.

A young witch teaches her mother how to do magic--with very unexpected results--in this relatable, resonant novel about family, identity, and the power of love.

Jamie is basically your average New England academic in-training--she has a strong queer relationship, an esoteric dissertation proposal, and inherited generational trauma. But she has one extraordinary secret: she's also a powerful witch.

Serena, Jamie's mother, has been hiding from the world in an old one-room schoolhouse for several years, grieving the death of her wife and the simultaneous explosion in her professional life. All she has left are memories.

Jamie’s busy digging into a three-hundred-year-old magical book, but she still finds time to teach Serena to cast spells and help her come out of her shell. But Jamie doesn't know the whole story of what happened to her mom years ago, and those secrets are leading Serena down a destructive path.

Now it's up to this grad student and literature nerd to understand the secrets behind this mysterious novel from 1749, unearth a long-buried scandal hinted therein, and learn the true nature of magic, before her mother ruins both of their lives.

More magic! Unusual and thoughtful book. The magic system is beautifully rendered, and the relationships are loving but complicated. There are echoes of 'absolute power corrupts absolutely', and warnings about how magic isn't always neutral and can go horribly wrong in the wrong circumstances, as well as the harm and dangers of keeping big secrets in a relationship. There is sorrow and fear and hate, but also hope and willingness to learn. If I had one quibble, it is that the language of reparation in the relationship is a little stilted and it comes off maybe a little preachy? Like, one partner has done something dishonest, and is duly guilty-ridden and ashamed, and then the other partner almost has too much power and seems to kind of relish it. This might be because I'm used to reading about relationships that deal with conflict in a less-healthy way. I think so far I prefer Anders's short stories to her books, but I just like her writing in general. 

Sunday, January 11, 2026

Books Read in 2025: Four-Star Mystery and Thriller and Library-versary

 I forgot a couple of awesome things on yesterday's post. Two days ago was the anniversary of the day I signed up for my very first library and information science course, sixteen years ago. Eve had started kindergarten so both kids were in school, but Matt was still traveling a lot, so my plan was to work my way through the diploma online and lowly, a course or two at a time. 


It mostly wasn't difficult - a lot of pretty basic writing - I got credit for a couple of courses from my Comp Lit degree. The Dewey Decimal course brought me to my knees, but that was not unusual. The course coordinator who I had to deal with fairly often did not seem like the sharpest knife in the drawer - once she told me that if I took more courses at a time I would finish the diploma sooner.

For a long time I wasn't sure I would ever have the confidence to apply for an actual job. For one of my placements I worked at my kids elementary school with the librarian I knew and was friends with, so that was a soft landing. I also did one at our local library branch, which was fun and more of a transition to working with people I didn't know. 

Another happy anniversary was yesterday, which was when I did my first sub period at a school. It was stressful and I did a lot of things wrong, but I got books to the kids and nobody asked me to leave. My lovely husband drove me because it was far (I really wanted to get one shift under my belt) and I didn't know where I would park.

Also, the first shift was 8 years ago, and soon after that I got my first actual job. This means that, because I had done placements, it did not actually take me ten years to finish my diploma, which in my head it kind of did. That is still a long time for a two-year diploma and... no, screw it, I started the diploma even though I was scared, I finished the diploma and I got a job - I got five jobs, and I still have three (they are baby jobs). 

Mystery/Thriller

The Chessmen (Lewis Trilogy #) by Peter May: Synopsis from Goodreads: Fin Macleod, now head of security on a privately owned Lewis estate, is charged with investigating a spate of illegal game-hunting taking place on the island. This mission reunites him with Whistler Macaskill—a local poacher, Fin's teenage intimate, and possessor of a long-buried secret. But when this reunion takes a violent, sinister turn, Fin realizes that revealing the truth could destroy the future.

-”As soon as he entered the cramped little space that was the cottage living room, Fin remembered the impression he had taken away from his last visit, a sense of manic and unmasculine tidiness.”

-”And in spite of himself he felt the stirrings of remembered lust deep in his loins.” (I assume it's due to the perimenopausal brainfog that I made a note here to reassure myself that I only copied this to remind myself to make fun of it)


I read the first in this trilogy in 2016 and the second at the beginning of last year. They are among the most vivid books I've ever read for sense of place (the Isle of Lewis in Scotland). The landscape is a character - harsh, tyrannical, and pitiless. People have either lived there their whole lives and are trapped and resigned, or they've gone away and ended up back there and are bitter. The past is filled with abuse and heartache and the present is full of anger and recrimination, and it's all very, very bleak. I'm not sorry I read this (all appearances to the contrary), but I'm sort of glad the series is over and I don't think I'll rush to start another series by this author. 

For quibbles: the male characters are fairly good, if a bit emotionally constipated (for obvious reasons, I assume you don't get a lot of pronouns in bio or intersectional feminism on the Isle of Lewis), but the author isn't great at writing women as anything other than waif-ish, mysterious, beautiful and a bit bitchy. Also, the phrase "deep in my loins" is used more than once, and really, is there a lot of depth in loins? I feel like the stirring happens pretty shallow in the loins, unless there's an issue that requires a urologist. 

It's not unrealistic for there not to be much character growth, especially with a backstory of poverty and neglect, but like I said, bleak.

We Solve Murders (We Solve Murders #1) by Richard Osman: Synopsis from Goodreads: Steve Wheeler is enjoying retired life. He does the odd bit of investigation work, but he prefers his familiar habits and routines: the pub quiz, his favorite bench, his cat waiting for him when he comes home. His days of adventure are over: adrenaline is daughter-in-law Amy’s business now.

Amy Wheeler thinks adrenaline is good for the soul. As a private security officer, she doesn’t stay still long enough for habits or routines. She’s currently on a remote island keeping world-famous author Rosie D’Antonio alive. Which was meant to be an easy job... 
Then a dead body, a bag of money, and a killer with their sights on Amy have her sending an SOS to the only person she trusts. A breakneck race around the world begins, but can Amy and Steve stay one step ahead of a lethal enemy?

-Mr. Kenna,

I understand completely; these things happen. While I still have great faith in you, be assured that if Amy Wheeler is not dead within a week, you will be.

Warmest regards,

Francois Loubet


-”Steve is currently lying down in a darkened room. Some people just can’t handle twelve pints of Guinness.”


-”’Okay, how to play this.

‘I’m afraid that I have a rule,’ says Rosie. ‘I won’t have breakfast with anyone who wants to kill me.’

‘Lucky I don’t have the same rule,’ says the man. ‘I would never eat.”


This kind of book - a bunch of quirky characters who proceed to have madcap adventures all over the world - either works for me or really doesn't, and it's a fine line between one case and the other. This just worked - obviously Richard Osman writes a readable book, I'm not sure why I read this one now instead of the second another Thursday Murder Club. There were just enough grounding details, maybe - grief, past trauma. Or just the right time for a book where people meet other people who lessen their sadness and make their lives better, in between getting shot at and drinking a shit ton of Guinness.


The Christmas Jigsaw Murders (Edie O'Sullivan #1) by Alexandra Benedict: Synopsis from Goodreads: THIS CHRISTMAS, A KILLER TAKES FAMILY GAMES TO A MURDEROUS NEW LEVEL.

On 19th of December, renowned puzzle setter, loner and Christmas sceptic Edie O’Sullivan finds a hand-delivered present on her doorstep. Unwrapping it, she finds a jigsaw box and, inside, six jigsaw pieces. When fitted together, the pieces show part of a crime scene – blood-spattered black and white tiles and part of an outlined body. Included in the parcel is a message: ‘Four, maybe more, people will be dead by midnight on Christmas Eve, unless you can put all the pieces together and stop me.’ It’s signed, Rest In Pieces.


Edie contacts her nephew, DI Sean Brand-O’Sullivan, and together they work to solve the clues. But when a man is found near death with a jigsaw piece in his hand, Sean fears that Edie might be in danger and shuts her out of the investigation. As the body count rises, however, Edie knows that only she has the knowledge to put together the killer’s murderous puzzle.

-”December was the worst of months according to Edie O’Sullivan. It brought cold memories and darkness that soaked into her like winter mist. At this time of year, she was never more than a foot away from shadows.Not even four in the afternoon and day was submitting to night. Night – a dark, rearranged thing that dismisses the sun.”


-(Berkeley) “‘I should’ve guessed that a crossword setter would be good at using words to avoid saying what they really mean.’

‘What can I say? You know that internet thing, Am I the Asshole? Well, I don’t need to ask, because I am most definitely, at all times, the asshole.’”


I don't usually read cozy mysteries, or holiday-themed ones, but I accidentally read a book before Christmas that made me think maybe I could branch out a little. Then I decided to read this in January, which is just weird, but here we are. I started reading it and initially it was a little darker than I expected, but basically it was what I was looking for - I love a curmudgeonly old woman (particularly a British one) who thinks she's smarter than everyone else and is often right. Often the device of the criminal mastermind who leaves clues is just too dumb, but it worked here (also I am completely inconsistent in my judgment of this kind of thing and offer no apology). 


Apparently this author writes many Christmas-themed mysteries but they are all standalones. I was kind of hoping for more Edie but am still going to read more - I was torn between waiting for the next Christmas or just mainlining them all in January, seasonal appropriateness be damned.  Edited to add: I have now started another one in January, so this is just going to be a weird thing I do now, kind of like when Matt's mom got t-shirts made for everyone that said Merry Christmas in red and green and Matt kept wearing his all year round and I said "you think that makes you look quirky, don't you?". Edited again to add: there is another Edie book! Edited a third time to add that I started reading another one and thought that it was not quite as strong as this one, and then read a Publishers Weekly review that said that The Christmas Jigsaw Murders was a "stumble" on the part of the author. That was a little humbling for me. 


Bluebird, Bluebird (Highway 59 #1) by Attica Locke: Synopsis from Goodreads: When it comes to law and order, East Texas plays by its own rules--a fact that Darren Mathews, a black Texas Ranger, knows all too well. Deeply ambivalent about growing up black in the lone star state, he was the first in his family to get as far away from Texas as he could. Until duty called him home.

When his allegiance to his roots puts his job in jeopardy, he travels up Highway 59 to the small town of Lark, where two murders--a black lawyer from Chicago and a local white woman--have stirred up a hornet's nest of resentment. Darren must solve the crimes--and save himself in the process--before Lark's long-simmering racial fault lines erupt.

A rural noir suffused with the unique music, color, and nuance of East Texas, Bluebird, Bluebird is an exhilarating, timely novel about the collision of race and justice in America.


-”The men rarely stood on common ground – belying the trope of twins who think with one mind – but for the fact that they were Mathews men, a tribe going back generations in rural East Texas, black men for whom self-regard was both a natural state of being and a survival technique. His uncles adhered to those ancient rules of southern living, for they understood how easily a colored man’s general comportment could turn into a matter of life and death. Darren had always wanted to believe that theirs was the last generation to have to live that way, that change might trickle down from the White House.

When in fact the opposite had proved to be true.

    In the wake of Obama, America had told on itself.”


-”’Pulled out the bayou on Friday, three days ago. Then the girl, washed up a quarter of a mile downstream just this morning.’

Odd, Darren thought.

Southern fables usually went the other way around: a white woman killed or harmed in some way, real or imagined, and then, like the moon follows the sun, a black man ends up dead. ‘What’s her cause of death?’ he asked.”


This was uncomfortably well done. The main character's intelligence, insight, and conflicts about his home and how he fits into the state and his family are rendered beautifully. Locke writes about racial tensions in the south in a manner that is articulate and instructive without being preachy. I was thinking this book series would make amazing television, and it turns out that not only is the series being developed for tv with Attica Locke writing and producing, but she has also written for tv shows including Empire, Little Fires Everywhere and When They See Us. And then I was impressed that she writes fiction so well, because sometimes when I read books written by television writers the dialogue is good but the connective tissue can be a bit lacking.


Fallen (Will Trent #5) by Karin Slaughter: Synopsis from Goodreads: There’s no police training stronger than a cop’s instinct. Faith Mitchell’s mother isn’t answering her phone. Her front door is open. There’s a bloodstain above the knob. Her infant daughter is hidden in a shed behind the house. All that the Georgia Bureau of Investigations taught Faith Mitchell goes out the window when she charges into her mother’s house, gun drawn. She sees a man dead in the laundry room. She sees a hostage situation in the bedroom. What she doesn’t see is her mother. . . .

Faith is left with too many questions and not enough answers. To find her mother, she’ll need the help of her partner, Will Trent, and they’ll both need the help of trauma doctor Sara Linton. But Faith isn’t just a cop anymore—she’s a witness. She’s also a suspect. The thin blue line hides police corruption, bribery, even murder. Faith will have to go up against the people she respects the most in order to find her mother and bring the truth to light—or bury it forever.

-”Jeremy was three years old by then. She had grabbed onto the idea of joining the force as if it was the only life preserver left on the Titanic. Thanks to two minutes of poor judgment in the back of a movie theater and what foreshadowed a lifetime of breathtakingly bad taste in men, Faith had gone straight from puberty to motherhood without any of the usual stops in between.”



-”Dale smiled at her. There was some cheese lodged between his central and lateral incisors. Sara tried not to judge. Dale Dugan was a nice man. He wasn’t handsome, but he was okay-looking, with the sort of features many women found attractive once they’d learned he’d graduated from medical school. Sara was not as easily swayed.” (Piss off, Sara).


I still hate Sara Linton. I will always hate Sara Linton (Engie is not wrong), but this book was good, so dammit, what do I do now? I liked that this book revolved more around Faith, who I love in the book AND in the tv show, and Faith's mom, who, likewise. I think I will still be better off just watching the tv show (seriously you guys, it is SO good) and maybe any of these books that get really well reviewed. It offends the compleatist in me, but the book blogging community probably can't withstand my Sara Linton Bitching for twelve full consecutive books.

One Puzzling Afternoon by Emily Critchley: Synopsis from Goodreads: A mystery she can't remember. A friend she can't forget. I kept your secret Lucy. I've kept it for more than sixty years . . .

It is 1951, and at number six Sycamore Street fifteen-year-old Edie Green is lonely. Living alone with her eccentric mother - who conducts seances for the local Ludthorpe community - she is desperate for something to shake her from her dull, isolated life.
When the popular, pretty Lucy Theddle befriends Edie, she thinks all her troubles are over. But Lucy has a secret, one Edie is not certain she should keep . . .
Then Lucy goes missing.


2018. Edie is eighty-four and still living in Ludthorpe. When one day she glimpses Lucy Theddle, still looking the same as she did at fifteen, her family write it off as one of her many mix ups. There's a lot Edie gets confused about these days. A lot she finds difficult to remember. But what she does know is this: she must find out what happened to Lucy, all those years ago . . .

-”There isn’t much to fill the papers with around here, especially judging by last week’s headline: ‘Chip Shop Uses Too Much Vinegar, Local Residents Complain.’”

-”When I first started riding the bicycle, it was far too big for me and, if I rode it to school, my father would lift me onto it outside the house, where I set off, wobbling along the road, praying I wouldn’t have to stop at the level crossing. If I did, I’d have to ask the signalman to put me back on.”

-”I wish I could stay forever in this kitchen with Ridi the doctor, the remnants of her busy family’s breakfast strewn all around us, the smell of toast, the warming mug of tea in my cold hands. But I know I can’t stay here forever. Someone is on their way and I suppose I’ll have to go soon. I want to ask Ridi who is coming and where I’ll be going, but perhaps it doesn’t matter. Perhaps it’s enough to be in this moment, in this warm, familiar yet unfamiliar kitchen, with this kind stranger.” (makes dementia sound heartwarming, like it leads to moments of whimsy and connection, but largely it doesn’t, does it?)

I do like the mystery in the past resurfacing in the future trope, but I had some doubts about a seventy-year lag time. Dementia can be dangerous as a device, risking being bent into shape to serve the plot. It was hard not being angered by Edie's son's reaction to her encroaching dementia, but it's likely a fairly realistic portrayal. The stifling atmosphere of rural England in the fifties is intense, as is the sense of the different socioeconomic statuses of Edie and the vivacious and privileged Lucy. The characterization of several female characters, all struggling with various dilemmas brought on by the way society marginalizes women, was very well done.

The Impossible Thing by Belinda Bauer: Synopsis from Goodreads: From the exceptionally original mind of CWA Gold Dagger Award winner and Booker longlisted author Belinda Bauer comes this sweeping tale of obsession, greed, ambition, and a crime that has remained unsolved for a hundred years. How do you find something that doesn’t exist?

1926. On the cliffs of Yorkshire, men are lowered on ropes to steal the eggs of the sea birds who nest there. The most beautiful are sold for large sums. A small girl—penniless and neglected by her family—retrieves one such treasure. Its discovery will forever alter the course of her life.

A century later. In a remote cottage in Wales, Patrick Fort finds his friend, Nick, and his mother tied up and robbed. The only thing missing: a carved case containing an incredible scarlet egg. Doggedly attempting to retrieve it, Patrick and Nick discover the cruel world of egg trafficking, and soon find themselves on the trail of a priceless collection of eggs lost to history. Until now.


A taut, wonderfully imagined novel brimming with skullduggery at every turn, The Impossible Thing is a blazing testament to Belinda Bauer’s status as one of our greatest living crime writers.

-”’Is it real?’

‘I think so’

‘Why is it red?’

‘Search me,’ said Weird Nick.

Patrick thought of the first time he’d heard another boy say those words – search me – and the playground scuffle that had ensued. He’d learned a lot since then.”


-”Nick didn’t bother swearing Patrick to secrecy. Patrick never told anybody anything. Unless they asked – then he told them everything. For instance, he had never told anyone that Weird Nick sometimes grew weed in the old greenhouse, but only because no one had ever asked him about it. Patrick found lies confusing, and happily unburdened himself of them at the earliest opportunity.”

-”The guillemot, or murre, or scout – scoot to use the vulgar Yorkshire – was not a big bird, but it laid an uncommonly big egg…. And, while the guillemot was not a rare bird by any means, every egg was not only decorating – adorned as it was with whirls and squiggles, and of all kinds of colours, from white through tan and grey and blue and green and chocolate – but was also unique. Each bird laid an egg that was unlike any other that had ever been laid by any other guiillemot in all guillemot history.”

Four and a half stars, at least. The description of the egg stuff in the book synopsis did not stir my interest at all, but I will follow Belinda Bauer anywhere, and goddamned if I was not, in short order, weeping for the poor pair of guillemots whose egg kept getting stolen (they didn't understand! They had instinct but no actual knowledge! Those egg snatchers were MONSTERS!) The early descriptions of Celie and her life were so distressing, and I had to push through somewhat, but it didn't take long for me to be completely ensnared. 

And then Patrick surfaced, and I thought 'hmm, sounds much like the protagonist of Rubbernecker', because I am an idiot who is constitutionally incapable of seeing the little subtitle that indicates that a book is part of a series, and then I was obviously all in (I was already all in). The egg trade and its evolution, the family life of the Sheppards, and the modern day mystery were all equally engaging. Patrick's internal monologue is wonderful, as is his relationship with Weird Nick (I hope it's not a portrayal that is offensive to people with autism). The sad parts were achingly sad, there were brilliant moments of humour and sweetness, and the whole thing was just masterful. 

Things Don't Break On Their Own by Sarah Easter Collins: Synopsis from Goodreads: A heart-wrenching mystery about sisters, lovers, and a dinner party gone wrong. Twenty-five years ago, a young girl left home to walk to school. Her younger sister soon followed. But one of them arrived, and one of them didn’t.

Her sister’s disappearance has defined Willa’s life. Everyone thinks her sister is dead, but Willa knows she isn’t. Because there are some things that only sisters know about each other—and some bonds only sisters can break.

Willa sees fragments of her sister everywhere—the way that woman on the train turns her head, the gait of that woman in Paris. If there’s the slightest resemblance, Willa drops everything, and everyone, and tries to see if it is her.

When Willa is invited to a dinner party thrown by her first love, she has no reason to expect it will be anything other than an ordinary evening. Both of them have moved on, ancient history. But nothing about Willa’s life has been ordinary since the day her sister disappeared, and that’s not about to change tonight.

Sarah Easter Collins has written an extraordinary novel about memory, lost love, and long-buried secrets that sometimes see the light of day.

-”The summer before she disappeared, my sister had spent the entire time bugging me to play chess. It was a pretty boring activity as far as I was concerned, because she could beat me hands down.

‘Do we have to?’ I said, when yet again I saw her setting up the board. ‘I don’t have the strategy.’

‘You’ve got strategy in spades,’ she said. ‘Your problem is that you don’t see the point.’

‘What’s the point?’

‘Patricide,’ she said. ‘You have zero interest in killing your father.’”


-”Claudette instantly rises from the table, slamming her hands on its surface as her chiffon scarf fills with air, flying open like a frill of lizard skin. ‘There is one single reason why a person would leave their known life, one reason alone. And that one, single reason is that the unknown world is ultimately less terrifying than their actual homes, which are hell on earth.’ For a second she glares hard at Jamie. Then she says, ‘Sod this.’”

There is a mystery in here, but it is only nominally a 'mystery', except for the deeper mysteries of why some people are condemned for loving who they do, and why some people think it's their right to abuse the people who love them. The most heartbreaking element is probably the way the violence in the family divided the sisters, because it's as unfair to blame the scapegoat for being resentful as it is to expect the 'privileged' one to be strong enough to defend the other. Also, the way that being the child of an abuser makes one so susceptible to being the partner of another one, however well-disguised. Very sad, very well-written.

This Book Will Bury Me by Ashley Winstead: Synopsis from Goodreads: After the unexpected death of her father, college student Jane Sharp longs for a distraction from her grief. She becomes obsessed with true crime, befriending armchair detectives who teach her how to hunt killers from afar. In this morbid internet underground, Jane finds friendship, purpose, and even glory...

So when news of the shocking deaths of three college girls in Delphine, Idaho takes the world by storm, and sleuths everywhere race to solve the crimes, Jane and her friends are determined to beat them. But the case turns out to be stranger than anyone expected. Details don't add up, the police are cagey, and there seems to be more media hype and internet theorizing than actual evidence. When Jane and her sleuths take a step closer, they find that every answer only begs more questions. Something's not adding up, and they begin to suspect their killer may be smarter and more prolific than any they've faced before. Placing themselves in the center of the story starts to feel more and more like walking into a trap...

Told one year after the astounding events that concluded the case and left the world reeling, when Jane has finally decided to break her silence about what really happened, she tells the true story of the Delphine Massacres. And what she has to confess will shock even the most seasoned true crime fans...

-”I know what you’re thinking – that I’m presenting a veneer of false humility to avoid telling you how I pulled off my investigative feats. You’ve heard things about me, from the news and The Person Who Shall Not Be Named. But I’m here to set the record straight. And the truth is, no matter how much I wish I could claim I was some sort of Albert Einstein figure, a failure in school because my brain was too advanced, I’ve never been a savant. Yes, sometimes I can read people well, but what I accomplished, I did through pure luck. Not brilliance and certainly not, as That Awful Book claimed, ‘ a near-sociopathic level of remorseless manipulation.’

As you’ll come to see, I feel plenty of remorse.”


-”Here’s the thing about mortality: the human brain isn’t designed to process it. Think about it. You spend your whole life in active subliminal repression of the fact that one day you will cease to exist. You have to forget this fact in order to get up and eat breakfast and work your menial job and pay the bills. Otherwise, you’d be a sobbing, terrified ball on the floor. The Real Crime Network felt liberating because they trafficked in the truth that death comes for all and, for some of us, in devastating ways.”

I've always been fascinated by the true crime community - people that want to dig into an unsolved crime and think they have a chance at catching something law enforcement has missed (not terribly hard to imagine). It's not a way my mind works at all but I can see it being addictive. Social media connecting a lot of these people just lends it a heightened dimension. This was very readable. Jane being drawn into the true crime group by the twin mysteries of the murder and the backstory of her father who she is grieving is a brilliant narrative technique. The foreshadowing could have been annoying, but stopped this side of overdoing it. The big 'twist' was fairly well telegraphed, but I wasn't mad about it. I had a look at a couple of her other books, but one looks like that thing that I hate - a group of 'friends' who all seem to hate each other, thus rendering it unbelievable that they would continue to get together. Things being what they are, it is likely that I will read another book by her at some point and then remember that I read this one.

Guilty By Definition by Susie Dent: Synopsis from Goodreads: Oxford, England. After a decade abroad, Martha Thornhill has returned home to the city whose ancient institutions have long defined her family. But the ghosts she had thought to be at rest seem to have been waiting for her to return. When an anonymous letter is delivered to the Clarendon English Dictionary, where Martha is a newly hired senior editor, it's rapidly clear that this is not the usual lexicographical enquiry. Instead, the coded letter hints at secrets and lies linked to a particular year. 

The date can mean only one thing: the summer Martha's brilliant older sister Charlie went missing. 
When more letters arrive, Martha and her team pull apart the complex clues within them, and soon, the mystery becomes ever more insistent and troubling. Because it seems Charlie had been keeping a powerful secret, and someone may be trying to lead the lexicographers towards the truth that will unravel the mystery of her disappearance. But other forces are no less desperate to keep their secrets well and truly buried, and Martha and her team must crack the codes before it's too late. 
From resident lexicographer Susie Dent comes a linguistic mystery that will both delight and shock readers.

-”Martha wanted to seize his audience by their neoprene lapels and tell them there was so much more to it than that. That language defines us and is the framework of our thought, an endless, shifting, complex dance through time and human nature. It is about patterns of life and the need to communicate them; it is about dying, renewal, and everything in between, about chaos and the order we make form chaos, the blood and bones of every history. Above all, it is about the slow, insistent pull into the secret lives of the ordinary.”

-”Martha glanced at her footwear. She opted to wear Doc Martens all year round, beneath long flowing dresses in a variety of prints. She preferred to wait for fashion to come to her rather than endlessly chase its coat-tails. ‘I don’t do heels.’” (ME!)

-chapter 37 heading: “lion-drunk, adjective (sixteenth century): the second of the four stages of drunkenness, in which a man becomes violent and quarrelsome”

In case you're wondering (I know I was):

The Four Stages (Historical)
This progression comes from a concept, famously noted by Victor Hugo in Les Misérables and earlier writers like Thomas Nashe, which linked animal behaviors to intoxication levels. 
  1. Ape-Drunk (First Stage): Lively, silly, singing, leaping, and generally foolishly jovial.
  2. Lion-Drunk (Second Stage): Bold, aggressive, quarrelsome, and prone to fighting or boasting.
  3. Sheep-Drunk (Third Stage): Dull, slow, incoherent, and unintelligent.
  4. Hog-Drunk (Fourth Stage): Complete stupor, oblivion, and brutishness, often leading to sleep. 

I know, I know. If a bunch of university students quoting Shakespeare is annoying, surely a book about lexicographical clues about a mysterious disappearance should leave me incoherent with disgust? This was absolutely ludicrous, even before you get to the reveal of who was sending the clues, which is off-the-charts ridiculous. But I liked it. I liked hanging around the editorial pool of the dictionary, judging the various personalities of Martha's colleagues. One of the book's greatest strengths was probably the authenticity of its female characters and their friendships.

Not surprisingly, I also really liked the meandering passages about certain words and their various definitions. There was a good balance between etymology writing and the mystery, with some good commentary about men in positions of authority behaving badly. 

Vera Wong's Unsolicited Advice for Murderers (Vera Wong #1) by Jesse Q. Sutanto: Synopsis from Goodreads: Sixty-year-old self-proclaimed tea expert Vera Wong enjoys nothing more than sipping a good cup of Wulong and doing some healthy ‘detective’ work on the internet (AKA checking up on her son to see if he’s dating anybody yet).

But when Vera wakes up one morning to find a dead man in the middle of her tea shop, it’s going to take more than a strong Longjing to fix things. Knowing she’ll do a better job than the police possibly could – because nobody sniffs out a wrongdoing quite like a suspicious Chinese mother with time on her hands – Vera decides it’s down to her to catch the killer. Nobody spills the tea like this amateur sleuth.


-”’So,’ Vera says as she settles down across from him and pours out tea for both of them, ‘what is the holdup? Young people should be moving fast, take the world by its male genitalia and so on.’”

-”’You said ‘shit,’ Emma says into Julia’s leg.

‘No,no. I said ‘shoot,’ you just heard wrong because you’ve got an ear pressed into my leg.’ Oh god, now she’s gaslighting her daughter, and she hates herself even more. ‘No, you’re right. Mommy did say ‘shit.’”


-”Vera can’t remember the last time she had so much fun. People always say that your wedding day is the happiest day of your life, but honestly, people should try solving murders more often.”

I have ventured more into the world of the cozy mystery the past few years. (Every time I say that I am seized with fear that I have defined 'cozy mystery' wrongly, but I believe this ticks the boxes - amateur sleuth, charming small-town setting, focus on puzzle-solving over gore, lighthearted tones, quirky characters (to the nth degree), satisfying resolution where good triumph, avoiding explicit violence, sex, or profanity. Oh, I quote the AI overview, I hate myself.
Anyway, Vera Wong is super quirky, almost too much so, but not quite. I am always a bit uncomfortable with the notion that in a cozy whoever dies 'deserves' to die, and also a bit bizarrely comforted by it. There is also the device of disparate people being drawn together by a precipitating event, which is both highly unlikely and extremely charming when it's pulled off deftly. I'm not sure I will continue with the series, but this was delightful, and comforting, at a time when I didn't feel like reading about shitty people being violent with other shitty people. This does suggest that there ARE times when I feel like reading about shitty people etc. etc. This, unfortunately, is accurate.


The Man Made of Smoke by Alex North: Synopsis from Goodreads: The latest gripping serial killer thriller from the New York Times bestselling author Alex North. Dan Garvie’s life has been haunted by the crime he witnessed as a child—narrowly escaping an encounter with a notorious serial killer. He has dedicated his life since to becoming a criminal profiler, eager to seek justice for innocent victims. So when his father passes away under suspicious circumstances, Dan revisits his small island community, determined to uncover the truth about his death. Is it possible that the monster he remembers from his childhood nightmares has returned after all these years?

With his signature shock and suspense, Alex North brings us The Man Made of Smoke. In turn emotional, introspective, and utterly terrifying, this is a story of fathers and sons, shadows and secrets, and the fight we all face to escape the trauma of the past.

-”My father took the turnoff for the rest area.

My mother said nothing. Which meant that she didn’t approve. She probably figured we were only an hour away from the island, so why not keep going? My mother was a woman who was always impatient to be somewhere else, even when she’d just arrived. When I think back to those times, it felt like she never knew what to make of me, as though a family had formed around her by accident.”


-”He turns back to the camper van. None of its own lights are on. The thing looks dead. It can surely only have been here for a handful of minutes without causing an accident, but a part of him can imagine it has sat long abandoned for years in some mirror version of this road, and has just now passed through a veil and shimmered into existence here.”

I sort of find a lot of North's books very similar in tone and plot, and yet I never seem to be able to resist reading the next one. This was the best of the recent bunch. I did get a little weary of the main character's constant harping on how he felt weak, worthless, cowardly, ashamed, and various other synonyms for 'like a pussy', until I realized this was probably me caving into the same unreasonable expectations of masculinity that had warped his life. The father-son relationship was affectingly done - it kind of wrecked me, honestly. There are so many ways that people can do their best, and try really hard, and still just fail to make the connection they're desperate to make. The plot was satisfyingly complex and complete. I guess I'm on the hook for the next one now.

The Puppet Show (Washington Poe #1) by M.W. Craven: Synopsis from Goodreads: A serial killer is burning people alive in the Lake District's prehistoric stone circles. He leaves no clues and the police are helpless. When his name is found carved into the charred remains of the third victim, disgraced detective Washington Poe is brought back from suspension and into an investigation he wants no part of.

Reluctantly partnered with the brilliant but socially awkward civilian analyst, Tilly Bradshaw, the mismatched pair uncover a trail that only he is meant to see. The elusive killer has a plan and for some reason Poe is part of it.

As the body count rises, Poe discovers he has far more invested in the case than he could have possibly imagined. And in a shocking finale that will shatter everything he's ever believed about himself, Poe will learn that there are things far worse than being burned alive...


This is probably one of the most perfectly paced mysteries I have ever read. I never felt like the action was too rushed or dragging at all. Poe verges on being a caricature of the world-weary detective who chafes against the tiresome narrow-mindedness of his higher-ups, but it still worked for me. I thought Tilly was a great character - reminiscent of Stephen King's Holly Gibney. It might be unrealistic, but I love seeing when an awkward character's strengths are recognized by someone who bothers to be perceptive. The relationship between Poe and Tilly is nice to watch develop. The Cumbrian setting adds a nice element as well. I really liked this and will continue with the series. 


Not Quite Dead Yet by Holly Jackson: Synopsis from Goodreads: A twisty thriller about a young woman trying to solve her own murder.

In seven days Jet Mason will be dead.
Jet is the daughter of one of the wealthiest families in Woodstock, Vermont. Twenty-seven years old, she’s still waiting for her life to begin. I’ll do it later, she always says. She has time.
Until Halloween night, when Jet is violently attacked by an unseen intruder.
She suffers a catastrophic head injury. The doctor is certain that within a week, the injury will trigger a deadly aneurysm.
Jet has never thought of herself as having enemies. But now she looks at everyone in a new light: her family, her former best friend turned sister-in-law, her ex-boyfriend.
She has at most seven days, and as her condition deteriorates she has only her childhood friend Billy for help. But nevertheless, she’s absolutely determined to finally finish something: 
Jet is going to solve her own murder.

3.75. A fresh version of D.O.A. (I know D.O.A. was also a remake) with great narrative energy. Some of that came at the expense of more profound characterization, but the pace captured the urgency of Jet's last days. It's hard not comparing all of Jackson's work to The Good Girl's Guide trilogy, but this probably landed the best for me of the last three. Jet was a good character, both as a black-sheep daughter and a self-questioning, late-twenties malcontent. 

Night Watcher by Daphne  Woolsoncraft: Synopsis from Goodreads: 

Nola Strate, a late night call-in radio host in Portland, Oregon, listens to stories of hauntings and cryptic sightings for a living. But one foggy, wet evening, when a caller describes an eerie scene that triggers memories of Nola’s escape from a serial killer years before, she becomes fearfully aware that he’s back to finish what he started
Nola Strate is being watched, again.
After an encounter with a notorious serial killer in the Pacific Northwest as a child, Nola has grown up and tried her best to forget her traumatizing night with The Hiding Man. She installed security cameras outside her Oregon home, never spoke of her experience, and now hosts Night Watch, a popular radio call-in show her semi‑famous father used to run. When coincidences lead Nola to believe that she is being stalked, and a caller on Night Watch has a live incident with an intruder in the caller’s home—the description of whom is chillingly familiar—Nola is convinced that The Hiding Man has resurfaced and is coming for her.


With a mysterious next‑door neighbor lurking in the shadows, more people getting hurt, the police not taking her concerns seriously, and evidence pointing towards her own father, Nola decides to become, like her listeners, a Night Watcher herself, and uncover the monster behind The Hiding Man’s mask.

-”Having heard stories like these my whole life, I automatically believe in it all. Spirits, aliens, even the boogeyman. It’s hard enough to accept that we’re all alive with skeletons and feelings and problems, spinning faster than we can comprehend on a giant sphere. Seeing doesn’t have to be believing.”


-”’And what did you tell them?’ I ask, patting the butt of a ketchup bottle and squirting thick sauce into the basket.” (thick. sauce.)


Three and a half. I was engaged while I was reading it. The writing is pretty good for a first novel, with some notable things that I kept noticing only because I tend to notice things like that, and once I start noticing I can't stop noticing until I nearly go insane. I once saw Charles de Lint speak and he said too many writers aren't comfortable with just using "he said". That was true in abundance here. "He boasts", "He admits", too many variations, when 'he says' would be perfectly appropriate. Also a lot of lip-biting and hair-tucking, and one scene in a diner where there are so many references to ordering and applying ketchup etc. that it distracts entirely from the dialogue. Also, someone can't talk while biting their lip, or it would sound really weird.

The mystery was solid. I kind of love Nola. She eats junk food, she drinks too much, she scrolls her phone on the toilet. The love interest worked but was kind of stuck on, could have used more grounding and backstory. I will read the next book by this author.


The Pigment Thief by Myka Silber: Synopsis from Goodreads: Ro is one of North City’s best art thieves, working with her expert team of hackers to steal art from the rich. Pre-collapse tactile pieces, digital installations, she does it all. It’s a pretty good gig, and keeps her out of the crosshairs of her psychotic ex-boyfriend. She’s gotten to where she is by being cautious and not taking unnecessary risks.

When she’s offered a lucrative gig to break into the Scitek Headquarters, however, curiousity gets the best of her. Her ex-boyfriend works there, and she can’t help but wonder why her favourite painting is suddenly in his company’s possession. Even her team can’t convince her not to take this one on, and besides, it’ll make them filthy rich. What could go wrong?

This was a tiny gem with beautiful cover art that plays off The Girl With the Pearl Earring brilliantly. Art heist plus cyberpunk plus relationship issues, plus AI is portrayed as creepy and not that effective. I loved the characters and the universe, and I hope both are expanded in the future. 

The Ghostwriter by Julie Clark: Synopsis from Goodreads: In June 1975 the Taylor family shatters in a single night when two teenage siblings are found dead in their home. The only surviving sibling, Vincent, never shakes the whispers and accusations that he was the one who killed them. Decades later, the legend only grows as his career as a horror writer skyrockets.

Ghostwriter Olivia Dumont has spent her entire professional life hiding the fact that she is the only child of Vincent Taylor. Now on the brink of financial ruin, she's offered a job to ghostwrite her father's last book. What she doesn't know, though, is that this project is another one of his lies—because it's not another horror novel he wants her to write.

-”Who would she have become, if her life hadn’t ended at age fourteen? I close my laptop and stare at the four walls surrounding me, the boxes towering nearly to the ceiling in places, letting myself feel the loss of someone I never had a chance to love.”

The concept of ghostwriting is rich with possibilities, and this hit a lot of really good notes. Complex family dynamic, generational trauma, woman reconnecting with estranged possible-murderer father, deciding the best way to tell a story, the gradual uncovering of decades-old secrets. The issues of both time periods are resolved well.

Too Old for This by Samantha Downing: Synopsis from Goodreads: A retired serial killer’s quiet life is upended by an unexpected visitor. To protect her secret, there’s only one option left—what’s another murder? From bestselling author Samantha Downing.

Lottie Jones thought her crimes were behind her.

Decades earlier, she changed her identity and tucked herself away in a small town. Her most exciting nights are the weekly bingo games at the local church and gossiping with her friends. 

When investigative journalist Plum Dixon shows up on her doorstep asking questions about Lottie’s past and specifically her involvement with numerous unsolved cases, well, Lottie just can’t have that.

But getting away with murder is hard enough when you’re young. And when Lottie receives another annoying knock on the door, she realizes this crime might just be the death of her…

-’I’m hardly a Luddite. I have a Wi-Fi network, my own cell phone, even a computer, but I am no expert. It’s impossible to keep up with advances today. If I take a nap, I miss some new technological advance. And I love my naps.”

-”’Baby daddies,’ Sheila says. ‘That’s what they’re called now.’

I cannot possibly be expected to keep up with whatever words are popular today. It’s hard enough to maintain the vocabulary I have.”



Three and a half. It was refreshing having a serial (ish) killer be a woman of a certain age and following all the logical, tedious steps involved in committing murder and getting away with it. I was engaged throughout, watching how murder fit in among church group and feeling that weird sympathetic hope that the bad guy (girl) gets away with it. It just wasn't quite funny enough to gloss over all the killing, and I guess I need a murderer to have some kind of code (like Dexter) in order to not start feeling kind of icked out by all of it. Maybe that's supposed to illustrate that even if you think everyone should get a couple of free murders in their life, it's not really the best idea?


They Never Learn by Layne Fargo: Synopsis from Goodreads: From the author of the “raw, ingenious, and utterly fearless” (Wendy Walker, USA TODAY bestselling author) Temper comes a dynamic psychological thriller about two women who give bad men exactly what they deserve.

Scarlett Clark is an exceptional English professor. But she’s even better at getting away with murder.

Every year, she searches for the worst man at Gorman University and plots his well-deserved demise. Thanks to her meticulous planning, she’s avoided drawing attention to herself—but as she’s preparing for her biggest kill yet, the school starts probing into the growing body count on campus. Determined to keep her enemies close, Scarlett insinuates herself into the investigation and charms the woman in charge, Dr. Mina Pierce. Everything’s going according to her master plan…until she loses control with her latest victim, putting her secret life at risk of exposure.

Meanwhile, Gorman student Carly Schiller is just trying to survive her freshman year. Finally free of her emotionally abusive father, all Carly wants is to focus on her studies and fade into the background. Her new roommate has other ideas. Allison Hadley is cool and confident—everything Carly wishes she could be—and the two girls quickly form an intense friendship. So when Allison is sexually assaulted at a party, Carly becomes obsessed with making the attacker pay...and turning her fantasies about revenge into a reality.

3.5 stars. Lord knows I have all the time in the world for books about angry women dispatching shitty men. The first half held my attention, a little of the tension leaked out for the second half. I bought the rationalization and the logistics, Carly's backstory and progression were credible, and the sleazy English professor was all too believable. There was one reversal that I didn't find wholly plausible, but over all I was rooting for Scarlett.

The Missing Half by Ashley Flowers: Synopsis from Goodreads: Nicole “Nic” Monroe is in a rut. At twenty-four, she lives alone in a dinky apartment in her hometown of Mishawaka, Indiana, she’s just gotten a DWI, and she works the same dead-end job she’s been working since high school, a job she only has because her boss is a family friend and feels sorry for her. Everyone has felt sorry for her for the last seven years—since the day her older sister, Kasey, vanished without a trace.

On the night Kasey went missing, her car was found over a hundred miles from home. The driver’s door was open and her purse was untouched in the seat next to it. The only real clue in her disappearance was Jules Connor, another young woman from the same area who disappeared in the same way, two weeks earlier. But with so little for the police to go on, both their cases eventually went cold.

Nic wants nothing more than to move on—from her sister’s disappearance and the state it’s left her in. But then one day, Jules’s sister, Jenna Connor, walks into her life and offers Nic something she hasn’t felt in a long time - hope. What follows is a gripping tale of two sisters who will do anything to find their missing halves, even if it means destroying everything they’ve ever known.

This was good - super dark, but good. Nic's story really hammered home how trauma can cause someone to be arrested at a certain point in their development, something that is often overlooked in books like this. 

Detective Aunty by Uzma Jalaluddin: Synopsis from Goodreads:After her husband’s unexpected death eighteen months ago, Kausar Khan never thought she’d receive another phone call as heartbreaking—until her thirty-something daughter, Sana, phones to say that she's been arrested for killing the unpopular landlord of her clothing boutique. Determined to help her child, Kausar heads to Toronto for the first time in nearly twenty years.

Returning to the Golden Crescent suburb where she raised her children and where her daughter still lives, Kausar finds that the thriving neighborhood she remembered has changed. The murder of Sana’s landlord is only the latest in a wave of local crimes which have gone unsolved.

And the facts of the case are Sana found the man dead in her shop at a suspiciously early hour, with a dagger from her windowfront display plunged in his chest. And Kausar—a woman with a keen sense of observation and deep wisdom honed by her years—senses there’s more to the story than her daughter is telling.

With the help of some old friends and her plucky teenage granddaughter, Kausar digs into the investigation to uncover the truth. Because who better to pry answers from unwilling suspects than a meddlesome aunty? But even Kausar can’t predict the secrets, lies, and betrayals she finds along the way…

Is this a cozy? Not entirely - Kausar Khan isn't exactly Vera Wong, although cozy elements are present. I lived in Toronto for a couple of years during my master's degree, so the setting was cool. Well-done elements were the description of the changed neighbourhood, with tensions between racialized people and the police, and the personalities of the grandchildren, dealing with the strain of their parents' fracturing relationship. Kausar is a great character - grieving but resolute, aware of her strengths and willing to leverage them to help her family. I was a bit perplexed at the big mystery mentioned that didn't seem addressed, until I realized that this is meant to be a series. I will keep following this character. 


If It Please the Court

I  I am going to talk a bit about Nance's comment on yesterday's post, which, to be scrupulously clear, I did not in the least inter...